<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Michaeli: Asia Ruminations &#187; Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asiaruminations.com/tag/climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asiaruminations.com</link>
	<description>Asian Geopolitics, Domestic Politics, and Everything in Between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is China Afraid of International Scrutiny?</title>
		<link>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/12/24/is-china-afraid-of-international-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/12/24/is-china-afraid-of-international-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Michaeli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wen Jiabao]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asiaruminations.com/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Foreign Policy article from earlier this week argues that China is &#8220;afraid to shine too bright a light in dark places,&#8221; revealing the corruption and disorder in most of China&#8211;and that this is why Wen Jiabao refused to subject Chinese emissions to outside scrutiny at Copenhagen. But the article&#8217;s author, John Lee of the Hudson Institute, is focusing on exactly the wrong part of the picture.
The article confuses the interests of the central government and local governments. Indeed, if (as claimed), the central government was planning on &#8220;cooking the books&#8221; ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/12/24/is-china-afraid-of-international-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagen: &#8220;China Won&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/12/21/copenhagen-china-won/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/12/21/copenhagen-china-won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Michaeli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G77]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wen Jiabao]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asiaruminations.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is expected to say in a podcast that a deal at Copenhagen was &#8220;held to ransom by a handful of countries.&#8221; His climate secretary wrote, more specifically, that it was China that had &#8220;vetoed&#8221; crucial proposals the entire developed world and most of the developing world stood behind.
The Financial Times reports seeing &#8220;a more assertive China&#8221; at the summit. And at least one paper&#8217;s conclusion from Copenhagen is: &#8220;China won, the world lost.&#8221;
But did China really win? It kept the Kyoto agreement intact and avoided ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/12/21/copenhagen-china-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S.-China Relationship (Radio Interview)</title>
		<link>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/11/17/radio-interview-icelandic-national-broadcasting-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/11/17/radio-interview-icelandic-national-broadcasting-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Michaeli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Michaeli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Imbalance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. China Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asiaruminations.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Media: Icelandic National Broadcasting Service &#8211; Radio 1 &#8220;Spegillinn.&#8221;
Subjects: President Obama&#8217;s trip to Shanghai and Beijing, and the U.S.-China relationship.
Length: 5:42.
This is the radio segment in which I was interviewed on President Obama&#8217;s trip to China in November 2009. The audio is in Icelandic except for my answers to interview questions.

Note: If you have trouble with the embedded MP3 file above, you can open or download the interview directly here.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2009/11/17/radio-interview-icelandic-national-broadcasting-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.asiaruminations.com/media/michaeli.chinainterview.2009.11.17.mp3" length="6861379" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
