<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Michaeli: Asia Ruminations &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asiaruminations.com/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asiaruminations.com</link>
	<description>Asian Geopolitics, Domestic Politics, and Everything in Between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:28:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s China Blunder</title>
		<link>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2010/03/22/googles-china-blunder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2010/03/22/googles-china-blunder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Michaeli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asiaruminations.com/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was never a chance that the Chinese government would cave to Google&#8217;s demand that it end censorship of search results, as I argued when Google first announced its threat to leave China in January:

For the Chinese government to cave in and begin allowing Google to display uncensored search results is inconceivable for many reasons. Here are two: First, Chinese authorities have long seen a “marketplace of ideas” as incompatible with the long-term maintenance of one-party rule, which is non-negotiable.
Second, the communist party, particularly under Hu Jintao, seeks to build ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2010/03/22/googles-china-blunder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Google is Trying to Do in China</title>
		<link>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2010/01/13/what-google-is-trying-to-do-in-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2010/01/13/what-google-is-trying-to-do-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Michaeli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asiaruminations.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s decision yesterday to begin reviewing &#8220;the feasibility&#8221; of its business operations in China has reverberated around the world, particularly in the high tech sector. Responding to the hacking of its corporate network and the accounts of Chinese human rights activists, Google is threatening to leave the Chinese market entirely, and says it is no longer willing to censor its search results on Google.cn.
What is Google&#8217;s strategy here? And what happens next?
Google&#8217;s statement reads, to me, like pure frustration and anger, not strategy. Human rights advocates are heartened by this ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asiaruminations.com/2010/01/13/what-google-is-trying-to-do-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

